Twitter Reddit LinkedIn Facebook


Alec wrote an article about the current issues of the technology. He makes a few good points but neglects to put them into context, unfortunately. We would like to provide some more context here.

  • “The same thing goes within the blockchain. I don’t think people really “need” the technology, but I am sure people need technology outcomes — freedom, trust, and privacy. …And the issue of a blockchain adoption is in the user experience.” - Andree @blended: He makes a valid point but does not add that freedom and privacy may be the result of having the technology in the first place.
  • “Technology should follow existing user behaviors and habits instead of reimagining user experience — that could make it successful” - Andree @blended: User behaviour–as generally as Alec writes about it–is not the result of technology. Alas, user behaviour in regard to product and tools does depend on the underlying technology, of course.
  • “Seems like this it could bring large value for a user, but jargon raises the wall of a misunderstanding between technology and user experience.” - Andree: Jargon does not help indeed. But it’s also important to note that this jargon makes it appealing to the early adopters and innovators, but of course not to the mainstream.
  • ”…use blockchain-specific terminology only in absolute need. Yes, it is trendy, but if you are trying to reach a wider audience, use words that people are familiar with.” - Andree: It’s not about trends. It’s a crucial way to tell visitors what a product is about.
  • “Some people could say that it does not matter, you can copy and paste this lengthy string, this is done for privacy and security, etc. Still, it is all about ease of use — domain names are way more readable than IP addresses, you can easily remember godaddy.com instead of 104.238.65.160.” - Andree: Absolutely valid point. It will take time though.
  • “To make changes, you need to get an agreement among all stakeholders, all smart contract participants.” - Andree: Only for the underlying chain, not products or services on top of that chain.
  • “Then you pay bitcoins (or, it is better to say, fractions of a bitcoin). And then real life happens — you wait for at least 30 minutes and pay commission on a top of your $4 cup of a cold coffee.” - Andree: This is a very superficial example. As per our experience, only shops that do have a nerdy crowd would offer that option, knowingly that it’s a pricey option.

Twitter Reddit LinkedIn Facebook

• • •

Thanks for reading. We, at blended.io, love to support your company imagine, conceptualize and realize competitive products & services that move your business forward!

But don't take our word for it:
“I really enjoyed the collaboration and appreciated their flexibility to adapt when requirements changed. The team does have the right blend of UX and engineering skills."
Deb Misra, Senior VP Engineering at fsinvestments.com

Visit blended.io


Only worthwhile content! Get our hands-on articles about UX, engineering and software design.